Jehovah the Living God

I. Introduction

Twenty-seven times, in the Old Testament and the New, Jehovah God through the pen of His inspired authors refers to Himself as the “living God” (the exact term; this includes two verses repeated, thus twenty-five unique references). It comes in various contexts, ranging from idolatry, to reproach of His Name, to declaration of His power, to His accompaniment with His own, to His “knowing”, to His (the Son’s) resurrection (“living” understood here), and so forth (Tab. 1). What is our God communicating to us when He reveals Himself in this way? This study will prayerfully endeavor to put forth some possibilities. When referring to the “living God” below, we have in mind Jehovah God [1].

II. The Living God is Personable

Premise: Only the living God, and none other (dead or inanimate “pretenders”), can be a personable God. A personable God engages persons. And persons in turn may engage a personable God (this is the function of prayer). In this way (sub-Premise): the living, personable God should be found to be a God of relationships. Thus one would expect that the living, personable God should be found to be a sensitive God, sensitive to His relationships with people, and uniquely so, relationally, on an individual basis, because relationships are individual, personable, and unique. And because relationships are best served by love (this is self-evident, but we may defer to the testimony of Scripture as well as individual and societal history here), one would expect that the living, personable God should be found to be a loving God. It follows that one would expect that the living, personable God should be found to draw people to Himself, so as to enter into loving relationships (consider Jhn 6:44-45, 12:32)—the general point that underscores this study in this context and the other contexts following is that only a living God can or would do this. Please watch for this point in those contexts as you go along. Moreover, one would expect that the living, personable God should be found to condescend to identify with people, again, in the interest of relationships (consider Phl 2:5-8, Hbr 2:17-18). The living, personable God should be found to be an available God, available to engage in relationships (“O, That Name!”, see and consider Hearer, Mindful, Near, Personable, et al.). And here Salvation, life eternal in the presence of the living God, is found to be the quintessential expression of Relationship, even with the living God (thus it is quintessential). Coming full circle, this Salvation Relationship only makes sense in the context of Life (living people+living God; consider Jhn 3:16 [this verse is much more than anti-Gnostic polemic…], Fig. 1). And because communication is characteristic of living beings, the living, personable God should be found to communicate His relational interests to people, who are an important object of His relationships, which are singularly meant to be Salvation relationships—here is the purpose of Scripture (or, the Communique), itself found to pivot on the living Jesus Christ, the Word of God (consider Jhn 12:49-50, 17:3).

III. The Living God is Sovereign

Sovereign precisely because He is omnipotent, omniscient, and omnipresent (“O, That Name!”, see Omnipotent, Omniscient, Omnipresent for Scripture references). Cast in the negative, were the living, personable, sovereign God not sovereign, He would not be “living” for long so to speak (He would in nowise be found to be eternal). Put positively, Premise: the living, personable, sovereign God holds in His sovereign hand the great causal network of Life, and certainly (1) the space-time infrastructure upon which this network unfolds in the domain of the mundane; (2) the infinite-eternal infrastructure upon which this network unfolds in the domain of the spiritual. Sub-Premise: (1) and (2) are interleaved in His hand, the former serving the latter (in particular, serving the Salvation Relationship [some might term this service the Sovereign’s “Divine Providence”]), (consider Exd 33:19, Isa 29:16, Jer 18:3-4, et al.).

IV. The Living God is Intelligent

Premise: Only the living, personable, sovereign, intelligent God can exercise His intelligence so as to create consummate Reality, which is singularly His Reality, which is absolute, universal Truth (“Ti Estin Alhqeia?”). And said consummate Reality one would in turn expect to be found to serve His relational interests. Thus the living, personable, sovereign, intelligent God should be found to communicate (with other intelligent living beings), to contemplate, plan, design, and (efficiently) create (consider Isa 1:18, Jer 29:11, Gen 1:1-7, 8-14, 15-21, 22-28); and as a relationally-motivated intelligent Being, should be found to interact with, and (efficiently) sustain the same where pertinent (consider Psa 145:16, Mar 4:39, Jhn 6:35, 51, 8:12, Hbr 1:3). One would expect the living, personable, sovereign, intelligent God to be found to be surpassing in His thoughts and ways (consider Isa 55:8-9), themselves aligned to serve His relational interests (consider (Isa 55:10-13, Jhn 8:12).

V. The Living God is the True God

It is intuitively obvious that the true God must be the living God (the true God cannot be a dead God of course); is this sound in the other direction (the converse): the living God must be the true God? Yes, because the true God should be found to be eternal; that deity is necessarily eternal satisfies both propositions (no beginning, no ending; for corroborative arguments please see “The Alpha and the Omega”, “John Chapter One Commentary” passim).

VI. Concluding Comments

This study sought prayerfully to understand as best as humanly possible why in His Word Jehovah God repeatedly refers to Himself as the “living” God. The answer almost seems to be obvious; in short, He is the One who lives, over against so many pretenders, animate and inanimate, that lived, or flourished, or were popular for a while, but are now dead and gone—while He Jehovah lives on. This eternality and attendant staying power in the world, the latter by way of His Church—altogether through His enduring Spirit—attests to the fact that He alone always has been, and is, and certainly always will be the true God. The centuries-long pored over prophecies that myriad numbers of clergy and laity, and countless scholars and theologians have found to be fulfilled in Jesus Christ, particularly, for our purposes, the force and weight of His (primary-source attested) resurrection, put a solid foundation under the highlighted text. So Jehovah declaring His eternality and attendant deity is seemingly the obvious answer to the question why in His Word Jehovah God repeatedly refers to Himself as the “living” God. But it became apparent as we moved on from there that this aspect of our God (as deity He lives, continuous action if you will) has some beautiful, blessed, byways besides, precisely because He is a (the) living God (“dead gods” have nothing to offer in this respect is the point we asked the reader to watch for above; these blessed byways are a reality only with a living God behind them, and He wants people to know that He is “alive and well” if you will and is indeed the One behind them, thus repeatedly declaring His eternality as the “living” God). The study, as it matured, sought to better appreciate these byway (living) treasures, and sought to bring them to the fore, for further study and insight by others.

In that regard, we talked about the living God as a personable God, He championing the roles of Companion, Helper, Friend, Confidant, Savior, et al. It was said that only the living God and none other can be a personable God. That a personable God engages persons, and persons in turn may engage a personable God (the function of prayer). That in this way the living, personable God should to be found to be a God of relationships. That one would expect the living, personable God to be found to be a sensitive God, sensitive to His relationships with people, on an individual basis. That because relationships are best served by love, one would expect that the living, personable God should be found to be a loving God, and consequently one would expect that the living, personable God should be found to draw people to Himself, so as to enter into loving relationships—and that only a living God can or would do these things (a main point of the study). And further, that one would expect the living, personable God to be found to condescend to identify with people, again, in the interest of relationships. We thought that the living, personable God should be found to be an available God, available to engage in relationships, and that Salvation, life eternal in the presence of the living, personable God, is surely the quintessential expression of Relationship. Here we thought that this Salvation Relationship must find expression in the context of Life (living people+living God). Because communication is characteristic of living beings, it was said that the living, personable God should be found to communicate His relational interests to people, which interests were primarily understood to be Salvation relationships (companionship for eternity with the living God, Himself found to be keenly desirous of the same).

We said that the living God is sovereign, precisely because He is omnipotent, omniscient, and omnipresent. We proposed that the living, personable, sovereign God holds in His sovereign hand the great causal network of Life, itself comprised of the space-time infrastructure upon which this network unfolds in the domain of the mundane, and holds in His hand the infinite-eternal infrastructure upon which this network unfolds in the domain of the spiritual. It was thought that these two realities are interleaved in the living, personable, sovereign God’s hand, the former serving the latter (in particular, serving the Salvation Relationship by design).

It was put forth that the living God is intelligent. That only the living, personable, sovereign, intelligent God can exercise His intelligence so as to create consummate Reality, which was said to be singularly His Reality, itself understood to be absolute, universal Truth. It was thought that this consummate Reality should be found to serve the living God’s relational interests, and that toward that end the living, personable, sovereign, intelligent God should be found to communicate (with other intelligent living beings), and to contemplate, plan, design, and (efficiently) create, and that as a relationally-motivated intelligent Being, He should be found to interact with, and (efficiently) sustain the same where pertinent. That one would expect the living, personable, sovereign, intelligent God to be found to be surpassing in His thoughts and ways, which were themselves said to be aligned to serve His relational interests.

Finally, it was said that the living God is the true God, because the true God should be found to be eternal (deity is necessarily eternal by any measure of “time,” for deity must by definition persist).

We have found that it is Jehovah God, as evidenced by the ministry of Jesus Christ, now carried forward by His Church through His enduring Spirit, that satisfies the above inquiries concerning the living God (“…should be found to be thus and so…”). Both Testaments, the Old and the New, communicate clearly that Jehovah God is, and is focused on, Life. The Old Testament and the New—the written record of the living God’s Communique—come together, intersect if you will, on this divine issue (both as a noun and a verb) of Life (Jhn 12:49-50). Death is an anomaly in the eternal design. Death entered because Sin (multifarious enmity toward the living God) entered through volitional, living creatures that chose death (Sin is death) rather than life (Jehovah God is Life).

It is not hard to appreciate that the living God imparts life; that the idea (intelligence) and materials (mass<>energy) originated with Him. No surprise then, that the only rational record concerning the origin, and especially concerning the vast diversity in its maturation, of Life, that humankind holds, comes from the living God; comes from, is communicated by, His Word. We can be sure then, that life is not spontaneous, because (1) the living God claims responsibility here; moreover, in total agreement with the living God’s claims, we can be sure that life is not spontaneous because (2) primordial energy did not appear spontaneously. It is sure that there is no rational, consistent, mundane theory for primordial energy. Any such theory that one looks at closely violates empirical laws at some point along the way. The living God does not contradict Himself in His account of the origin of Life and its great diversity. He goes further than that even, claiming to be the Creator also of the great stage upon which Life is actually played out (intelligence + mass<>energy, in the extreme), again, without contradicting Himself at any level of maturation in His outworkings here (be it physical proper, or physical+spiritual when humankind is in view). Notice by the way that the latter (physical+spiritual) would force tremendous unaccounted for complexity onto what is without it a relatively simple, and sloppy for want of comprehensiveness, notion of “life” that secular origins models espouse and (rather forcibly these days) teach. Well, left out here is the living God, the causal Agent, the Creator, responsible for both Life and primordial energy (in any age, God only ever has a remnant that espouses Him—nothing new here). So much for the creation of Life and energy. Please notice now the flip-side consistency in this—neither Life, nor the energy in the created order, can be destroyed by mundane, physical agency whatsoever. One knows that these may indeed change states—a living spirit undergoes change, as humankind has learned from God’s Word, and energy undergoes change, as humankind has learned from experience—but they are never destroyed (God may destroy here of course; may destroy a soul in hell for example [note Jesus-Mat 10:28; but cf. Jesus-Jhn 12:49-50, 3:16; consider Ecc 12:7]). This inviolate non-destruction speaks volumes back over across to the other (creation/flip) side. So, mundane, physical agency can neither create—because primordial energy must be accounted for first—nor even destroy here. Isn’t that interesting… To Jehovah the living God be the Glory!

Praised be Thy Name great Jehovah God, Thou Author and Sustainer of Life. Yea Thou, that ever livest; even Thou, the Great I AM, whom we exceedingly love and adore.